Competitive read · generated 2026-09-08

Epicosity

epicosity.com · Higher education institutions and financial institutions (banks/credit unions) as their two named specializations, with recurring public-health/government agency work (e.g. state department of health tobacco/vaccination campaigns) as a secondary vertical

This report lives athttps://epicosity-ci.dev.archerscaling.ai

Who you're actually up against

Each of these was found by the tool and then confirmed by fetching that company's own live page on 2026-09-08. If one of them is wrong, that is worth thirty seconds of your time to tell me — it is the most useful thing in this report.

Austin Williams

https://www.austinwilliams.com

Full-service NY ad/marketing agency ("we ignite brands we disrupt markets we inspire action") specializing in healthcare, higher education, financial, and professional services clients — directly overlapping Epicosity's higher-ed and bank/credit-union buyers.

directverified 2026-09-08

Carnegie

https://www.carnegiehighered.com

A higher-ed-exclusive enrollment, marketing, and student-success consultancy serving regional public and mid-size colleges/universities (Georgia Southern, University of Idaho, Kettering, Ohio Wesleyan, among others).

directverified 2026-09-08

Stamats

https://www.stamats.com

A century-old Cedar Rapids, Iowa full-service marketing agency specializing exclusively in higher education and healthcare, selling enrollment marketing, branding, and digital/AI-SEO strategy to colleges and universities — the same Midwest regional-public and community-college buyer segment as Epicosity's higher-ed case studies.

directverified 2026-09-08

Where the positioning differs

A read, not a measurement.

You sell distinctiveness. Carnegie sells the enrollment number.

Your higher ed page names the enemy as sameness: "great higher education marketing isn't about simply differentiating your institution—it's about identifying and celebrating its distinctive character," and the podcast page offers to help institutions "break the cycle of safe, same and forgettable" and get out of the "Sea of Sameness." Carnegie's homepage opens somewhere else entirely — "Carnegie is the student connection company helping colleges and universities solve their most urgent and complex challenges" — then asks the visitor to pick from "I Need Help With: Enrollment, Student Success, Branding, Digital Advertising, Institutional Strategy," and its service pages are named after the buyer's own machinery: Enrollment Management, Predictive Analytics, Slate Optimization, Financial Aid Optimization. From the outside, a VP of enrollment reads your page as an answer to "our marketing looks like everybody else's" and Carnegie's as an answer to "we are going to miss the class." Both are real problems. Only one of them is the sentence a president uses in a budget meeting.

On your site AI is something you use. On theirs it's something the institution buys.

Across your homepage, /what-we-do, /higher-education, /financial-institutions and /growth-marketing, AI appears exactly twice, both times describing how your own team works: "We harness advanced technology—including AI and machine learning—to gather real audience data in minutes, not hours," and "integrating AI & machine learning." Stamats puts "AI & SEO Strategy" first in its list of eight named service lines and answers the buyer's question flat out on that page: "SEO, GEO, AI Search Optimization. No matter what you call it, Stamats integrates the best practices and principles for discoverability into every project." Carnegie sells "AI Strategy & Governance" and "AEO" as separate named services and links a page titled "Responsible AI" from its own top nav. A read: their AI copy is written for a buyer who has to answer a board question, and yours is written for a buyer wondering how the work gets made.

One page for every institution type, against a nav that splits them into five.

Your footer reads the same on every page — "a full-service growth partner specializing in creative, strategy, digital and media services for higher education and financial institutions" — and a single /higher-education page carries the whole range you describe on it: "from flagship and regional state universities to private universities, and community and technical colleges." Carnegie's nav splits that identical audience into five named buyer types: Undergraduate, Graduate, Professional & Continuing Education, Community & Technical Colleges, Online. Stamats pairs higher ed with healthcare and leads on tenure instead — "For 100 years, Stamats has been more than a service provider" — while Austin Williams claims four verticals at once, "healthcare, higher education, financial, and professional services." A read: a community college marketing director and a flagship enrollment VP land on the same page of yours, and on Carnegie's they don't. That gap tends to show up on the shortlist, where "they get schools like ours" is what does the cutting.

Where the content differs

Counted from published pages on both sides.

26 posts in your news feed, and the categories are all about the agency.

Counted on 8 September 2026 across all three pages of epicosity.com/news: 26 posts. Eight are award announcements, seven are staff milestones and individual honours, six are new-client announcements, four are interns and culture, one is a project story. None of the 26 titles contains AI, SEO or AEO. Your footer labels that section "News & Insights." Counted the same day off the competitors' own live feeds: Carnegie's ten most recent posts ran 4 June to 14 August 2026, three of the ten naming AI in the title, including "ChatGPT Ads and the Future of Higher Ed Search Marketing"; Stamats' ten most recent ran 6 July to 31 August 2026 and include "'Do You Do SEO/AEO?' We Do, and You Should Too!" and "Add These 3 Tips to Your Higher Ed AI Visibility Playbook"; Austin Williams publishes far more slowly — its ten most recent span February 2024 to 4 August 2026 — but three of its four posts dated 2026 name AI, the newest being "Does Your Brand Have an AI Visibility Problem? Here's How to Fix It."

Two gated downloads against a library of 188.

You gate two assets, one per vertical: the higher ed content strategy ebook with its worksheet, and the financial brand archetype whitepaper. Carnegie's own resource sitemap lists 188 distinct resources, and 18 of those URLs name AI, AEO, generative search or LLMs — among them "aeo-higher-education-80-20-rule," "ai-search-higher-ed-aeo-webinar" and "are-you-human-national-study-on-student-perceptions-of-ai." Its nav sorts the library into Research, On-Demand Video, Blog and NEXT Magazine, with events split into Webinar, Training and In-Person plus a 2027 conference. Two of those 188 are guides on how to write a marketing RFP. On your side, counted: RFP appears zero times on your homepage, /what-we-do, /higher-education, /financial-institutions, /growth-marketing and /lets-talk, while Stamats runs a "Got an RFP for Us?" upload form on both its homepage and its service page.

Eight podcast episodes, five of them your own staff, nothing since April.

Counted from your podcast's own RSS feed: eight episodes. Seven were published between 1 October and 4 December 2025, and the most recent — Frank Camp, Executive Director of Brand Strategy at the University of Arizona — is dated 15 April 2026, close to five months ago. The feed's own episode descriptions identify five of the eight guests as Epicosity people: "Epicosity Video Director Travis Berg," "Epicosity Account Executive Bergen Lindner," "Epicosity's Content Marketing Specialist," "Epicosity's Media Director Tom Koeller" and "Epicosity's Vice President of Creative Luke Tatge." Two guests are higher ed practitioners and one is an outside founder. The page's own claim is that "A Matter of Degrees isn't just another higher ed marketing podcast." Counted the same day, Stamats' show is at season 2, episode 17, published 21 August 2026, and four of its ten most recent posts are episodes, each headlined with a named outside guest.

Where they're outpacing you

The two or three things that would be visible to a buyer comparing you side by side.

Answer engine optimization is already a named case study on Carnegie's site, and not a word on yours.

Carnegie publishes a client case study at carnegiehighered.com/work/rice-business-answer-engine-optimization, titled "Answer Engine Optimization Drives Stronger Visibility to Strengthen Early Discovery." On the page: +49% change in visibility score, #1 position in share of voice, 70% more site sessions attributed to AI search year over year, 300% more conversion events year over year, and a named quote from Rice Business's Senior Director of Marketing and Communication. Carnegie also runs standalone /service/aeo/ and /service/ai-strategy-governance pages, both live. On your side, counted: SEO, AEO, answer engine, generative, paid search and search marketing appear zero times across your homepage, /what-we-do, /higher-education, /financial-institutions and /growth-marketing. A read: when a VP asks all four of you what you're doing about students who ask ChatGPT which schools to look at, three of the four have a page to send and one has a conversation to have.

Your two best-quantified higher ed campaigns are not on your work page.

Counted 8 September 2026: epicosity.com/sitemap.xml lists 32 case study pages under /work/, and the /work index links 25 of them. All seven unlisted pages return HTTP 200, and two are exactly the higher ed proof a shopping buyer wants — "University of Pittsburgh at Bradford: Recruitment campaign surpasses conversion goals by 75%" and "Western Technical College: Western smashes full-time enrollment goals by 3.2%." Both institutions' logos appear in the client band on your /higher-education page, so a buyer can see the client and cannot reach the story. Also unlisted: "Explorers Credit Union: Rebrand brings new life to CU," and a page still addressed as /work/uaptc-draft. Of the nine higher ed case studies that are on /work, one headline states a figure ("Lane experiences 10% year-over-year growth"); of the four financial ones, none do. Stamats' homepage opens on "167% Increase in RFI Leads" and its service page carries "4.8/5.0 — from 1,797 reference ratings on FeaturedCustomers."

A default placeholder is scrolling across your bank and credit union page.

In the client logo band on /financial-institutions, the visible list holds 23 items: 22 logo images and one heading that reads "Add some content here," linked to https://www.website.com. It sits inside the band that is there to show you have done this before, on the page a credit union marketing director lands on from a referral. A read: on its own it is a five-minute fix, but placed next to Stamats' RFP upload form and reference-rating count on the equivalent page, it is the kind of detail a procurement committee circles — because the band is the proof, and one of the 23 slots is unfinished.

How this was made, and what it does and doesn't know